I'll support AFM no matter the format but I'm concerned that readership will only continue to dwindle with a move to strictly on-line.
I discovered AFM through a styrene kit - Polar Lights' Wolf Man. There was an insert in the box encouraging subscriptions. Otherwise, it's unlikely I would have found AFM, or discovered the various shows or met the people I've met and corresponded with in the hobby (on the other hand maybe I would have saved a small fortune in kit purchases!

).
My point is, without having that extra profile of being on a news stand I'm afraid AFM will only be visible to those of us who are already 'in the know' and in the hobby.
It's already hard enough for some people in this hobby to stay on top of what's happening with new kit releases. Just recently there was a thread here on the CH about Jeff Yagher releases and how FB is
the place to find out about new kits, how producers aren't even bothering to keep the CH up to date on their releases. If some of
us in the hobby aren't even aware of where to find new releases how on earth do you expect new comers to find out? I myself am a member of roughly 20 different FB groups as I try to keep tabs on what's going on. I realize AFM had fallen behind when it came to information on new kits - FB groups have replaced that function - but for the casual hobbyist,
esp. the ones not on FB, AFM was/is a great resource for modellers and producers who continued to buy ads. The ads must have paid off or they wouldn't have bought them....
Without AFM and a more robust use of the CH as the common ground used by all I'm concerned the hobby will become more and more fractured as modellers try to find the right FB pages to join just to find out what's going on their own hobby.